<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadband Politics - Latest Comments in Worst Net Neutrality Bill Re-introduced</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Networking technology and policy</description><atom:link href="https://bennettblog.disqus.com/worst_net_neutrality_bill_re_introduced/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:44:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Worst Net Neutrality Bill Re-introduced</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2008/05/worst-net-neutrality-bill-re-introduced/#comment-2135128</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that all this meddling with the networks will only serve to inhibit new technologies.  Increasing government regulation does this.  Just look at all the new technologies that cannot happen or don't work correctly because of the DMCA.  What we need to focus on is de-regulating the monopoly phone &amp;amp; cable companies.  Removing that shell of protection will cause a firestorm of competition, lower prices and improve service quality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Russ Johnson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:44:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Worst Net Neutrality Bill Re-introduced</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2008/05/worst-net-neutrality-bill-re-introduced/#comment-2135127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is the equivalent of saying that a company can't choose to distinguish itself from competitors by offering expedited shipping (e.g. "3 day select" for the price of ground shipping). While the "neuts" call this "pay to play" and "discrimination" that will be done by the big guys, in fact it's the little guys and new entrants who are at least as likely to do it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brett Glass</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:30:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>