<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadband Politics - Latest Comments in Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Networking technology and policy</description><atom:link href="https://bennettblog.disqus.com/net_neutrality_payola/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:10:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/06/net-neutrality-payola/#comment-2134356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You said it yourself, Richard:  "Bloggers of high reputation only blog about issues they understand." That statment is just stupid on its own merits. But let's hold you to your own fool-hardy standards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So Richard, where's your documentation? What about that question didn't you "understand"? Or is your reputation less than high?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have also claimed that MoveOn takes money from Google. Still waiting on that proof as well. Enlighten us oh wise "original blogger,' you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kathy c</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 08:10:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/06/net-neutrality-payola/#comment-2134355</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliantly argued, neo. Take the blue pill.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/06/net-neutrality-payola/#comment-2134354</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that all anti-net neutrality politicans are being bribed by telcos or telco lobbyists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I agree that all anti-net neutrality bloggers are being paid or making money posting against net neutrality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">neo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:41:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/06/net-neutrality-payola/#comment-2134353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You work for Jerome Armstrong, don't you Matt? And you claimed that Cox Cable was "discriminating" against Craig's List, didn't you? I'm just putting two and two together.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd have more respect for you if you were getting paid, frankly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And Sean, bloggers of high reputation only blog about issues they understand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/06/net-neutrality-payola/#comment-2134352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You don't have the documentation because no one is in fact paying me to blog about net neutrality.  Please retract your baseless accusation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Stoller</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:29:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/06/net-neutrality-payola/#comment-2134351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"It seems obvious that somebody is paying Stoller," you say. Do you realize a comment like that, which is unfounded in fact, is potentially libelous?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Get a clue: bloggers blog. That's what we do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean-Paul Kelley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:26:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/06/net-neutrality-payola/#comment-2134350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Karr is an employee of Free Press, the lead organization in the Astroturf Save The Internet campaign. He admits they pay him to edit the Save the Internet blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems obvious that somebody is paying Stoller, but I don't have the documentation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 05:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/06/net-neutrality-payola/#comment-2134349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Richard, very interesting stuff. The pro-neutrality folks love to claim "astroturf" about anyone who's being paid to advocate a position. I've got no problem with the practice (it's no different than retaining an attorney), though disclosure is helpful and increases credibility. My anti-neutrality arguments are free of charge. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, do you have some documentation on Stoller and Karr on this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt S</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:14:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality Payola</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/06/net-neutrality-payola/#comment-2134348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is a joy to hear Senator Ted Stevens:&lt;br&gt;Republican Ted Stevens of Alaska told a group of cable executives last week, "The more I seek to find what the problem is, the harder job I have of trying to define it."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I understand that he won't support legislation that is using terms that are incapable of being defined - meaning game over for the whole ridiculous concept of "net neutrality". Of course he is a politician - so that is subject to change.&lt;br&gt;See &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1980529,00.asp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1980529,00.asp"&gt;eWeek  article&lt;/a&gt; for details.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stuberman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:49:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>