<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadband Politics - Latest Comments in Google&amp;#8217;s censorship abuses</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Networking technology and policy</description><atom:link href="https://bennettblog.disqus.com/google8217s_censorship_abuses/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:56:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google&amp;#8217;s censorship abuses</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2007/02/googles-censorship-abuses/#comment-2134908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Richard, I was thinking the same when I first read about Gisburn's run-in.  As usual, you were a bit quicker.  In a post today I cite you and others and I hope advances this some more (and also give you credit for a phase that should be coined).  CZ&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://poliblog.verizon.com/poliblog/blogs/poliblog/czblogger1/233/free-speech-and-the-net-regulation-distraction-.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://poliblog.verizon.com/poliblog/blogs/poliblog/czblogger1/233/free-speech-and-the-net-regulation-distraction-.aspx"&gt;http://poliblog.verizon.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CZ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:56:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>