<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadband Politics - Latest Comments in Glasnost Not Actually Correct</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Networking technology and policy</description><atom:link href="https://bennettblog.disqus.com/glasnost_not_actually_correct/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:16:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Glasnost Not Actually Correct</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2008/05/glasnost-not-actually-correct/#comment-2135147</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another aspect of the trial worth noting is that the testers appear to have turned off the BT feature that automatically retries a reset connection, something George has commented on in his writings.  Thus, every transfer the Max Planck Institute attempted that received a reset packet automatically was registered as a "block" even though, if Max Planck had allowed BT to retry the connection, it may have proved that the upload was merely delayed rather than "blocked."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wally</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 16:16:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glasnost Not Actually Correct</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2008/05/glasnost-not-actually-correct/#comment-2135146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The report implies that seeding is blocked - "2 out of 2 BitTorrent transfers interrupted." In fact, no BitTorrent transfers were interrupted, they were only delayed. A TCP stream does not equate to a BitTorrent transfer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 02:05:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Glasnost Not Actually Correct</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2008/05/glasnost-not-actually-correct/#comment-2135145</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I know seeding is possible on my connection, but Glasnost claims it isn’t.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's not what the report you posted says. It says that forged TCP reset packets were sent. Is that incorrect?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:42:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>