<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadband Politics - Latest Comments in Business climate</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Networking technology and policy</description><atom:link href="https://bennettblog.disqus.com/business_climate/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 04:56:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Business climate</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2002/09/business-climate/#comment-2127934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a California statistic from my own business:  Year 2000: $2800,000 for all insurance including Work Comp.  Year 2004: $1,000,000 for all insurance including Work Comp.  Most of this increase is for Work Comp, or as I like to call it: The Full Employment Act for Chiropractors. Get the picture?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 04:56:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business climate</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2002/09/business-climate/#comment-2127940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ha ha! Yet again those wunnerful Murican executives shoot themselves in feet. Lets see. Good business climate=screw your workers=bad business climate. Geddit?!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fast Pete</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 02:51:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business climate</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2002/09/business-climate/#comment-2127935</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I got three out of four right.  I guessed Texas and Florida for having no state income tax, and I guessed California and New York.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Haney</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 11:29:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business climate</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2002/09/business-climate/#comment-2127936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My immediate choices for 2 worst were RI and MD, since I've lived in both states.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steevil (DrWeevil's bro Steve)</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2002 06:27:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business climate</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2002/09/business-climate/#comment-2127939</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No way would I have guessed Texas.  The climate here stinks if you're working it every day.  Dallas is a dead, dead city biz-wise.  No start-ups, no original home-grown ideas (OK, Mary Kay and TI), no innovation except in arena deals.  Houston is probably the most vibrant economy here, thanks to the ship channel and awl bidness.  Austin is circling the drain, still in shock from the &lt;a href="http://dot.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="dot.com"&gt;dot.com&lt;/a&gt; fallout.  San Antone is holding on, thanks to a low level of civic over-commitment and five (four?) air bases &amp;amp; Ft. Sam.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would have guesses CO, AZ and GA, as tops.  And yup, CA and NY as the worst just on the basis of taxation.  My little startup employer is having it's share of the troubles...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business climate</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2002/09/business-climate/#comment-2127938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Simon should tattoo this on his forearms, and read from it every day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Welch</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 11:52:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business climate</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2002/09/business-climate/#comment-2127937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My guesses (Worst: California &amp;amp; Massachusetts; Best: Virginia and North Carolina) were better than I expected.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dodd</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:06:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>