<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadband Politics - Latest Comments in Adam Cohen drinks the Kool Aid</title><link>http://bennettblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Networking technology and policy</description><atom:link href="https://bennettblog.disqus.com/adam_cohen_drinks_the_kool_aid/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:53:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Adam Cohen drinks the Kool Aid</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/adam-cohen-drinks-the-kool-aid/#comment-2134192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The great thing about the internet is that it has had this freedom.  Why would anyone believe that this regulation is for the public good?  More and more people have the internet and the freedom to surf it as they please.  My poor grandmother out in a rural part of Iowa has it.  Regulation is just a way for the regulators and the people asking for regulations to line their pockets and protect their own interests.  This regulation will kill competition and drive up the price for us working folks, and you know it won't stop.  They will regulate all over the net.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">King of Apathy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:53:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam Cohen drinks the Kool Aid</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/adam-cohen-drinks-the-kool-aid/#comment-2134191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the "Four Freedoms" do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 16:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam Cohen drinks the Kool Aid</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/adam-cohen-drinks-the-kool-aid/#comment-2134190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Doesn't current FCC authority already protect consumers from the "evil" telcos?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calamityjane</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:54:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam Cohen drinks the Kool Aid</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/adam-cohen-drinks-the-kool-aid/#comment-2134189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think NetChick sums it up best "there is no problem". Government regulation should be considered a "last resort" solution when an exisiting list of grievances has been established or regulation is actually *gasp* needed! I don't know whether it's Teleco bashing or just plain greed, but I think the brakes need to be put on NN. Also, these days, I buy what the Times is selling in their editorials about as much as I'd believe that Moby and Michael Stipe know what's best for the internet!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SoCal619</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 09:26:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam Cohen drinks the Kool Aid</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/adam-cohen-drinks-the-kool-aid/#comment-2134188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn't agree more.  The New York Times seems to craft their editorial pieces verbatim from &lt;a href="http://Moveon.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Moveon.org"&gt;Moveon.org&lt;/a&gt; talking points.  You make an interesting point about the Telcos.  There has been residual ill-will against telephone companies that goes back for decades.  And now, some (like Google) are hoping that this will result in more governmental regulation of the Internet.  This is lobbying at its finest, and here's hoping our legislators come to their senses.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">intiger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:03:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam Cohen drinks the Kool Aid</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/adam-cohen-drinks-the-kool-aid/#comment-2134187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's been a background noise of telco-bashing in America as long as I can remember, going back to the monopoly days, and an end-to-end cargo cult as long as there's been a Web. But the COPE Act brought the issue to a boil.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vint Cerf's ego is damaged by the idea that somebody might actually improve the Internet, and Tim Berners-Lee's ego by the realization that an Internet optimized for communication would make canned content less interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's a ragged mob always ready to protest for the fun of it, so all these things came together in a perfect storm of stupidity.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 21:38:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adam Cohen drinks the Kool Aid</title><link>http://bennett.com/blog/2006/05/adam-cohen-drinks-the-kool-aid/#comment-2134186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why is net neut such a big deal all of a sudden? There is no problem, so why does government need to intervene right this second! Its just not needed - Google just wants a free ride on the internet highway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Net Chick</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 20:43:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>